I had problem with my computer and I lost all my files I saved from march
I tried to fix it but it didn't work so I had to combine my memory and your flowsheet.
MOTION: | ||||
Date: | | GOVERNMENT | | OPPOSITION |
Introduction | Pts | Name Seung Min | | Name Seung Chul |
Delivery | 8.8 /10 | Lack of confidence More power needed | 9.0 /10 | Easy to understand More confidence would have been better |
Arguments | 9.0 /10 | Good try but lack of logics in some parts | 9.2 /10 | Good rebuttal and ideas Specific examples would have been better |
Notes | Tot 17.8 /20 | | Tot 18.2 /20 | |
| ||||
Rebuttal One | Pts | Name Jin Kwan | Pts | Name Seung Chan |
Delivery | 9.0 /10 | More fluency would be better | 9.2 /10 | Good tone and strong emotion |
Arguments | 9.0 /10 | The third argument was good but the rebuttals were not logical | 9.3 /10 | The rebuttals were good No logic left for the gov |
Notes | Tot 18 /20 | | Tot 18.5 /20 | |
| ||||
Rebuttal Two | Pts | Name Da Eun | Pts | Name Kwon Suk |
Delivery | 9.2 /10 | Easy to understand | 9.1 /10 | Calm delivery More emotion would been better |
Arguments | 9.1 /10 | repetitive | 9.2 /10 | Plain but standard logical |
Notes | Tot 18.3 /20 | | Tot 18.3 /20 | |
| ||||
Conclusion | Pts | Name Jiyeon | Pts | Name Jegug |
Delivery | 9.5 /10 | Best | 9.4 /10 | humourous |
Arguments | 9.3 /10 | Did her best for the team | 9.3 /10 | Nice logic Good ending |
Notes | Tot 18.8 /20 | | Tot 18.7 /20 | |
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기